The philosophy of sufficiency economy as his Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej is graciously pleased with his words unto the people of Thailand since 2517 (1974). and has been talking about in December 4 to guide the correction of 2540 (1997) Asian financial crisis, can the existence, 2540 (1997) stable and sustainable globalization and its transmitters. Localism has to determine the country's development ideology [need references] By panyachon in Thailand many of you have commented such as paint, factm prawet WA RS Cham charm of Zurich, Prof. Sen, and Prof. chat application apichai thip conceptual link see notes by SUPA sufficiency economy to culture, community, which has been proposed earlier by the Government came to a number of ongkronok since the 1990s, 2520 (1977), a Buddhist and has helped the concept of localism is known widely in Thailand.Office of the Director of the national economic and social development has invited experts in economic and other disciplines come together and refine his words processing subject to sufficiency economy packaging in the national economic and social development plan, vol. 9, and as the article title "agro.Chaya of localism "and allowed to pray bangkhon thunphra please ask for Royal Royal Royal thanop RA diagnosis. When October 22 2542 (1999) by Lord please give corrections and improvements deign Church. His most exalted paradise tea breaks thanop RA, an article that he edited and published. To the guidelines of the Office of the Board of Directors of the national economic and social development, and the parties involved. As well as the public in General, when November 21 2542 (1999).This has been the philosophy of sufficiency economy, Angel Chu from the United Nations, whether it is a philosophy that is beneficial to the country Thailand and international. And encourage the Member countries based on a sustainable approach to development, with many academics and economists agree with the guidelines the sufficiency economy, but at the same time. Some of the media to question the bravery of the United Nations, as well as the reliability of the reported studies and the attitude of the organization.