Obesity has become a growing global concern. Evidence indicates that ecological factors are most predictive
of obesity among children, and that a new strategy, referred to as emolabeling, may effectively address ecological
factors, although the extent to which it can influence food choice is not yet known, but tested here. Specifically, we tested
the hypothesis that children aged 3 to 11 years will use emolabels, or emotional correlates of health (i.e. healthy-happy,
unhealthy-sad), to make healthy food choices. A cross-sectional design was used with two phases. In Phase 1, children
were taught how to use emolabels with a “faces of health” lesson. In Phase 2, children made choices between
containers that were laid out on a large table in pairs and varied by taste (tastes good, no information), social norms
(popular, not popular), branding (image of a minion, no image), or preference (told what food was in each container). A
control pair was labeled with only emoticons. The order and presentation of the containers were counterbalanced for
each variation. Results showed that a significant proportion of children in the pre-literacy and the early literacy grades
used emoticons to specifically make healthy food choices in each variation (p < .05 for all tests), except when children
were told what foods were in the containers. In all, emolabeling effectively influenced food choices for healthy foods
among children aged 3 to 11 years, more so than labeling for taste, social norms, and branding, but not preference.