Arguments against:
a. The kidney is situated in John's body, which is his property. He
’ therefore has the right to decide what to do with it.
b. There is no obligation to a family member who is either not known by
or is greatly disliked by the potential donor. Therefore, in response to
“Helen is your sister," John could legitimately say, “So what?"
c. There is a low but real risk of death from an operation to remove
John's kidney. Therefore, John's concern is valid and should be
respected.
d. There is also the risk of living with only one kidney. What if John has
an accident or disease in the future which affects his one and only
kidney? Again, John's concern is a reasonable one and should be
respected.
Arguments against: a. The kidney is situated in John's body, which is his property. He’ therefore has the right to decide what to do with it.b. There is no obligation to a family member who is either not known byor is greatly disliked by the potential donor. Therefore, in response to“Helen is your sister," John could legitimately say, “So what?"c. There is a low but real risk of death from an operation to removeJohn's kidney. Therefore, John's concern is valid and should berespected.d. There is also the risk of living with only one kidney. What if John hasan accident or disease in the future which affects his one and onlykidney? Again, John's concern is a reasonable one and should berespected.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
