The IPSec have both of advantage and disadvantage that have the problem that in some cases, direct end-to-end communication such as transport mode. It isn't save.
The one of the biggest problem of IPsec is its complicate. While IPsec can change it has contributed popular and it also make confusion and security experts to state that "IPsec contains too many options and too much flexibility"...
The standard to satisfy various factions of the standardization body quite often add the political nature committees, additional features, option and flexibility. In expired 1998, the process that used in the development of the Advanced Encryption Standard has some different with the process stands in stark.
Furthermore, some documentation of IPsec is complex and confusing. Not only the overview is provided but also the goals of IPsec recognized. The pieces are assembled by user and try to make sense of documentation, so that can be explained as quite hard to read.
For example, the frustration a user has to endure, consider the ISAKMP qualifications. There are many qualifications that missing in various locations which are key explanations, contain numerous errors and contradict themselves.
The other disadvantages of IPsec is any vulnerabilities, so that occur at the IP layer. Additional, some vulnerabilities that also exist in the IP layer could not be passed to the joint network across the IPsec tunnel.
The last disadvantage of the IPsec is tunneling mode. there have reducing network performance when encryption of the small or many packets that generates a lot of network overhead.
The IPSec have both of advantage and disadvantage that have the problem that in some cases, direct end-to-end communication such as transport mode. It isn't save.
The one of the biggest problem of IPsec is its complicate. While IPsec can change it has contributed popular and it also make confusion and security experts to state that "IPsec contains too many options and too much flexibility"...
The standard to satisfy various factions of the standardization body quite often add the political nature committees, additional features, option and flexibility. In expired 1998, the process that used in the development of the Advanced Encryption Standard has some different with the process stands in stark.
Furthermore, some documentation of IPsec is complex and confusing. Not only the overview is provided but also the goals of IPsec recognized. The pieces are assembled by user and try to make sense of documentation, so that can be explained as quite hard to read.
For example, the frustration a user has to endure, consider the ISAKMP qualifications. There are many qualifications that missing in various locations which are key explanations, contain numerous errors and contradict themselves.
The other disadvantages of IPsec is any vulnerabilities, so that occur at the IP layer. Additional, some vulnerabilities that also exist in the IP layer could not be passed to the joint network across the IPsec tunnel.
The last disadvantage of the IPsec is tunneling mode. there have reducing network performance when encryption of the small or many packets that generates a lot of network overhead.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
