B5:C9 and F6:F9), (2) cells representing the variables and the objective function we
seek to evaluate (solid rectangle cells, B13:013), (3) algebraic definitions of the objective function and the left-hand side of the constraints (dashed rectangle cells, 05:09) and (4) cells that provides explanatory names or symbols. Solver requires the first
three types only. The fourth type enhances the readability of the model and serves no
other purpose. The relative positioning of the four types of information on the spreadsheet need not follow the layout shown in Figure 2.12. For example,the cells defining
the objective function and the variables need not be contiguous, nor do they have to be
placed below the problem. What is important is that we know where they are so they
can be referenced by Solver. Nonetheless, it is a good idea to use a format similar to the
one suggested in Figure 2.12, because it makes the model more readable
B5:C9 and F6:F9), (2) cells representing the variables and the objective function we
seek to evaluate (solid rectangle cells, B13:013), (3) algebraic definitions of the objective function and the left-hand side of the constraints (dashed rectangle cells, 05:09) and (4) cells that provides explanatory names or symbols. Solver requires the first
three types only. The fourth type enhances the readability of the model and serves no
other purpose. The relative positioning of the four types of information on the spreadsheet need not follow the layout shown in Figure 2.12. For example,the cells defining
the objective function and the variables need not be contiguous, nor do they have to be
placed below the problem. What is important is that we know where they are so they
can be referenced by Solver. Nonetheless, it is a good idea to use a format similar to the
one suggested in Figure 2.12, because it makes the model more readable
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..