.1. Reliability Table 2 presents the reliability coefficients obtained in this study for the whole sample (N = 75), which were estimated using the Cronbach's alfa (α) and Guttman's second lower bond for test reliability (λ2) (Hypothesis 1). The reliability coefficients ranged for all scales from “minimally acceptable” to “unacceptable”, according to the criterion established by DeVellis (2017) to interpret the reliability indices (“unacceptable”, coefficients below 0.60; “undesirable”, between 0.60 and 0.65; “minimally acceptable”, between 0.65 and 0.70; “respectable” between 0.70 and 0.80; “very good”, between 0.80 and 0.90): Cronbach's alphas ranged from 0.65 to 0.23, and Guttman's λ2 coefficients, from 0.68 to 0.30. All coefficients are less than acceptable, with coefficients below the minimum of 0.70 pointed out by several authors (e. g.