investigates how expanded use of fi sh processing waste in fi shmeal and fi sh oil production might aff ect the market of these
fi sh-based products, where, in addition to the baseline countries, all countries that produce fi shmeal or fi sh oil are now assumed to have
the option to use waste in their production starting in 2011. Aquaculture expansion has relied in large part on improvements surrounding
feed, including feed composition for nutrition and digestibility as well as cost eff ectiveness, genetics of fi sh, and feeding techniques and
practices. While anticipated continuation of these improvements is already incorporated in the baseline parameters, this scenario addresses
possible expansion of feed supply by utilizing more fi sh processing waste in the production of fi shmeal and fi sh oil. The model indicates that
fi shmeal production in 2030 would increase by 12 percent and fi shmeal price would be reduced by 14 percent relative to the 2030 results in
the baseline case. This would boost the aquaculture production of freshwater and diadromous fi sh, salmon, and crustaceans. Although cost
is involved in selection, collection, and reduction of fi sh waste, use of the additional feedstock represents a great opportunity to increase
fi shmeal and fi sh oil production, especially where organized fi sh processing is practiced. For example, 90 percent of the ingredients used in
fi shmeal produced in Japan come from fi sh waste (FAO data).5
Globally, about 25 percent of fi shmeal is produced with fi sh processing waste
as ingredient (Shepherd 2012). Increased use of fi sh waste would reduce the competition for small fi sh between fi shmeal production (that
is, indirect human consumption) and direct human consumption.
investigates how expanded use of fi sh processing waste in fi shmeal and fi sh oil production might aff ect the market of these
fi sh-based products, where, in addition to the baseline countries, all countries that produce fi shmeal or fi sh oil are now assumed to have
the option to use waste in their production starting in 2011. Aquaculture expansion has relied in large part on improvements surrounding
feed, including feed composition for nutrition and digestibility as well as cost eff ectiveness, genetics of fi sh, and feeding techniques and
practices. While anticipated continuation of these improvements is already incorporated in the baseline parameters, this scenario addresses
possible expansion of feed supply by utilizing more fi sh processing waste in the production of fi shmeal and fi sh oil. The model indicates that
fi shmeal production in 2030 would increase by 12 percent and fi shmeal price would be reduced by 14 percent relative to the 2030 results in
the baseline case. This would boost the aquaculture production of freshwater and diadromous fi sh, salmon, and crustaceans. Although cost
is involved in selection, collection, and reduction of fi sh waste, use of the additional feedstock represents a great opportunity to increase
fi shmeal and fi sh oil production, especially where organized fi sh processing is practiced. For example, 90 percent of the ingredients used in
fi shmeal produced in Japan come from fi sh waste (FAO data).5
Globally, about 25 percent of fi shmeal is produced with fi sh processing waste
as ingredient (Shepherd 2012). Increased use of fi sh waste would reduce the competition for small fi sh between fi shmeal production (that
is, indirect human consumption) and direct human consumption.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
