Mayer (2009) states that his research goal is to contribute to the cognitive theory of multimedia learning, and ultimately to practical applied instructional practice. While criticizing the technology- centered use of multimedia for instruction and the misapplication
of cognitive load theory, Mayer (2005b), Ballantyne (2008), and Schnotz (2008) have all stated that it is the instructional method that is important, not the technology, no matter how sophisticated. Ultimately, the validation of the theory lies in the fact that it has a large body of studies and literature to support it, that it has exhibited “staying power” and that it continues to demand
attention and exert influence in the fields of education and training. The power of the theory lies in its dynamic structure, in which it is expected and even driven to constantly change and morph as new information is discovered and tested in the field of cognitive science.
Mayer (2009) states that his research goal is to contribute to the cognitive theory of multimedia learning, and ultimately to practical applied instructional practice. While criticizing the technology- centered use of multimedia for instruction and the misapplicationof cognitive load theory, Mayer (2005b), Ballantyne (2008), and Schnotz (2008) have all stated that it is the instructional method that is important, not the technology, no matter how sophisticated. Ultimately, the validation of the theory lies in the fact that it has a large body of studies and literature to support it, that it has exhibited “staying power” and that it continues to demandattention and exert influence in the fields of education and training. The power of the theory lies in its dynamic structure, in which it is expected and even driven to constantly change and morph as new information is discovered and tested in the field of cognitive science.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
