In this study, secondary data collected with the same instrument during the period prior to implementation
of a social intervention (that is, from Poovatanikul, 1993; Ratchaneeladdajit, 1997; Taraseina,
1993) are compared with first-hand data collected a decade after implementation. In this case, the
intervention consisted of the NEA. We propose that this landmark legislation radically changed the
institutional context for Thailand’s 35,000 principals. Thus, the first-hand data collected in 2008 can
be viewed as a measure of the impact of NEA-related policies on principal role behaviour in Thailand.
Framed more explicitly in terms of the Far West Lab model, this research seeks to understand if
and how principals have responded to substantial changes in their institutional context.
In this study, secondary data collected with the same instrument during the period prior to implementationof a social intervention (that is, from Poovatanikul, 1993; Ratchaneeladdajit, 1997; Taraseina,1993) are compared with first-hand data collected a decade after implementation. In this case, theintervention consisted of the NEA. We propose that this landmark legislation radically changed theinstitutional context for Thailand’s 35,000 principals. Thus, the first-hand data collected in 2008 canbe viewed as a measure of the impact of NEA-related policies on principal role behaviour in Thailand.Framed more explicitly in terms of the Far West Lab model, this research seeks to understand ifand how principals have responded to substantial changes in their institutional context.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
