As the child with a BT experiences progressive dysphagia, bulbar weakness, cognitive decline, and fatigue, parents may request a nasogastric tube to be inserted for nutrition. Parents of children with BT express deep concern that their child will suffer and starve to death if the child remains hungry yet is unable to eat orally. Parents frequently request the insertion of nasogastric or gastrostomy tubes. Neuro-oncology teams have a key role in guiding and navigating patients and their parents through this ethical struggle ahead of time as part of advance care planning (ACP). Withholding/withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration is a deeply personal decision for patients and parents, often rooted in religion, country of origin, culture, and tradition. For health care professionals, withholding/withdrawing nutrition is a complex ethical issue. It is important for neurooncology teams to facilitate and support this complex decision-making to minimize decisional regret. Parents should be counseled that artificially feeding an unresponsive and dying child will not improve quality of life or change the outcome. Hydration may put the patient at risk for pooling of respiratory secretions, respiratory distress, pleural effusions, and ascites. Parenteral feeding or intravenous hydration may not only jeopardize skin integrity due to frequent voiding and stooling, but the act of changing incontinent patients may trigger incidental or worsening pain.