3.3. Uniformity of carcasses and commercial cuts
Coefficient of variation within diet groups for CW, BF, loin weight, and dressed ham weight are given in Table 5. Coefficient of variation, used in this study to assess the uniformity of carcass traits, averaged about 6, 7, 8, and 14% for CW, dressed hams weight, loins weight, and BF, respectively. For each trait, there was some variation in the CV across the tested diets, with the MHP group showing the lowest uniformity, i.e. the greatest relative variation, for all traits. However, we did not detect any significant difference across groups when we tested trait uniformity by comparing CI of the CV. Furthermore, box plots (Fig. 1) showed that the within-group variation was comparable for all diet groups and traits. Together, these findings reveal that carcass uniformity was not affected by the tested changes in dietary CP and AA.
3.3. Uniformity of carcasses and commercial cuts
Coefficient of variation within diet groups for CW, BF, loin weight, and dressed ham weight are given in Table 5. Coefficient of variation, used in this study to assess the uniformity of carcass traits, averaged about 6, 7, 8, and 14% for CW, dressed hams weight, loins weight, and BF, respectively. For each trait, there was some variation in the CV across the tested diets, with the MHP group showing the lowest uniformity, i.e. the greatest relative variation, for all traits. However, we did not detect any significant difference across groups when we tested trait uniformity by comparing CI of the CV. Furthermore, box plots (Fig. 1) showed that the within-group variation was comparable for all diet groups and traits. Together, these findings reveal that carcass uniformity was not affected by the tested changes in dietary CP and AA.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..