The first-generation preoccupation with meta-theory obviously had
its limits given feminism’s normative claim to provide a radical alternative
to realism (Runyan and Peterson 1991). As Richard Price and
Christian Reus-Smit (1998: 263) argued ‘the third debate was inward
looking, concerned primarily with undermining the foundations of dominant
discourses in International Relations’. While feminist challenges to
International Relations opened the space for critical scholarship, they
begged the question of what a feminist perspective on world politics
would look like substantively, and how distinctive it would be (Zalewski
1995). Seventeen years after the first journal in the field devoted a
special issue to ‘women and international relations’ (Millennium 1988)
much has also been accomplished by feminist International Relations
scholars, short of transforming the often gender-blind study of international
relations. Most courses on International Relations theory worldwide
now consider gender issues or feminist perspectives due to the
publication of several exemplary texts and monographs by feminist
International Relations scholars (Tickner 1992, 2001; Sylvester 1994a;
Pettman 1996; Steans 1998; Peterson and Runyan 1999). Several key disciplinary journals have published whole issues on the subjects of
women, gender and feminism in international relations, and in 1999 the
International Feminist Journal of Politics was established to promote dialogue
among scholars of feminism, politics and International Relations.
The first-generation preoccupation with meta-theory obviously hadits limits given feminism’s normative claim to provide a radical alternativeto realism (Runyan and Peterson 1991). As Richard Price andChristian Reus-Smit (1998: 263) argued ‘the third debate was inwardlooking, concerned primarily with undermining the foundations of dominantdiscourses in International Relations’. While feminist challenges toInternational Relations opened the space for critical scholarship, theybegged the question of what a feminist perspective on world politicswould look like substantively, and how distinctive it would be (Zalewski1995). Seventeen years after the first journal in the field devoted aspecial issue to ‘women and international relations’ (Millennium 1988)much has also been accomplished by feminist International Relationsscholars, short of transforming the often gender-blind study of internationalrelations. Most courses on International Relations theory worldwidenow consider gender issues or feminist perspectives due to thepublication of several exemplary texts and monographs by feministInternational Relations scholars (Tickner 1992, 2001; Sylvester 1994a;Pettman 1996; Steans 1998; Peterson and Runyan 1999). Several key disciplinary journals have published whole issues on the subjects ofwomen, gender and feminism in international relations, and in 1999 theInternational Feminist Journal of Politics was established to promote dialogueamong scholars of feminism, politics and International Relations.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
![](//thimg.ilovetranslation.com/pic/loading_3.gif?v=b9814dd30c1d7c59_8619)