This article focuses on the opportunities and potential benefits of collaborative judicial
working and social processes within the new Family Court. To illustrate this, findings
from a recent evaluation by the authors of the Greater Manchester Gatekeeping and
Allocation – Care Proceedings Pilot (the Manchester Pilot) will be presented. In the
Manchester Pilot, the allocation of care cases to a particular level of court became a
collaborative judicial decision, to be achieved through consensual decision making.
The social processes of face-to-face communication, negotiation, knowing and
learning from each other in this new procedure, provide the main area of analysis in this
article. Findings from our evaluation illustrate issues and opportunities for the lower
courts under the new allocation arrangements within the Family Court, and may in
some respects reflect aspects of other research of social processes such as Paterson’s
studies in the appellate courts.
This article focuses on the opportunities and potential benefits of collaborative judicialworking and social processes within the new Family Court. To illustrate this, findingsfrom a recent evaluation by the authors of the Greater Manchester Gatekeeping andAllocation – Care Proceedings Pilot (the Manchester Pilot) will be presented. In theManchester Pilot, the allocation of care cases to a particular level of court became acollaborative judicial decision, to be achieved through consensual decision making.The social processes of face-to-face communication, negotiation, knowing andlearning from each other in this new procedure, provide the main area of analysis in thisarticle. Findings from our evaluation illustrate issues and opportunities for the lowercourts under the new allocation arrangements within the Family Court, and may insome respects reflect aspects of other research of social processes such as Paterson’sstudies in the appellate courts.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..