Though each principal was able to build on strengths of the school system as a whole, the general view of those we interviewed was that it was their leadership skills, especially their ability to mobilize staff and pupils, that made their schools outstanding (Teddlie & Stringfield, 1993). Both drew the broader traditional and modernizing cultures in this mobilization effort, as evidenced by the efficiency of their school organizations, attention discipline, beliefs about hard work and practice, and an unashamedly proactive notion of leadership itself. However, it was in the different ways that these broader cultural influences were put to work in the school that made the schools and the leadership styles distinctive. Thus, whilst both espoused such traditional values a filial piety and hard work, they turned to Western organizational literature for such idea as consultative management and group work.
Though each principal was able to build on strengths of the school system as a whole, the general view of those we interviewed was that it was their leadership skills, especially their ability to mobilize staff and pupils, that made their schools outstanding (Teddlie & Stringfield, 1993). Both drew the broader traditional and modernizing cultures in this mobilization effort, as evidenced by the efficiency of their school organizations, attention discipline, beliefs about hard work and practice, and an unashamedly proactive notion of leadership itself. However, it was in the different ways that these broader cultural influences were put to work in the school that made the schools and the leadership styles distinctive. Thus, whilst both espoused such traditional values a filial piety and hard work, they turned to Western organizational literature for such idea as consultative management and group work.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..