Cohort fixed effects control for variation across cohorts that do not also vary across counties. They cannot control for countyvarying cohort trends that may have occurred over the 29 years of this study. I address this issue by controlling for linear cohort trends at the county level (e.g., interaction terms of county dummy variable with linear time trends). In order to make the estimates comparable to the 2SLS estimates, I restrict the sample to only counties for which there is geographic data and estimate the same specification as the second stage of the 2SLS. This differences-indifferences specification does not explicitly control for orchards because planting orchards is likely to be endogenous. Column (2) in Table III shows the basic fixed effects estimates. Column (3) shows the estimate when I control for county-level cohort trends. The point estimates are similar. They show that planting tea decreased the fraction of males by 1.3 and 1.2 percentage points. Estimates from both specifications are statistically significant at the 5% level. Thus, the OLS estimates are robust to differential linear changes across cohorts between counties.