Descriptive statistics including frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations were obtained for the 247 participants’ responses. An average importance rating was calculated for each of the 105 intervention items on a summative rating scale using the following numeric codes: 1 = not at all important, 2 = slightly important, 3 = moderately important, and 4 = very important. The interventions were then ranked by average importance rating. In addition to the overall ranking, separate intervention rankings were obtained from the subset of surveys returned from the two cancer center hospitals (n = 45) and compared with surveys from the noncancer hospitals using t tests. All calculations were performed using SAS 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).