Motivation for change is often regarded as a
crucial factor in treatment success. Client motivation
has been shown to be susceptible to various
types of therapist influence (Miller, 1985). Motivational
interviewing is one approach designed to
increase problem recognition and the probability
of treatment entry, continuation, and compliance
(Miller, 1983; Miller, Sovereign, & Krege, 1988).
In the language of Prochaska and DiCIemente's
(1982) stages of change, it was intended to move
clients from a state of precontemplation, through
the ambivalence of contemplation, onto a point of
decision and commitment to change. Five general
principles of motivational interviewing were specified
by Miller and Rollnick (1991): (a) express
empathy through reflective listening, (b) develop
discrepancy between the client's goals and current
problem behavior, (c) avoid argumentation and
direct confrontation, (d) roll with resistance
rather than opposing it directly, and (e) support
self-efficacy for change.
Motivation for change is often regarded as acrucial factor in treatment success. Client motivationhas been shown to be susceptible to varioustypes of therapist influence (Miller, 1985). Motivationalinterviewing is one approach designed toincrease problem recognition and the probabilityof treatment entry, continuation, and compliance(Miller, 1983; Miller, Sovereign, & Krege, 1988).In the language of Prochaska and DiCIemente's(1982) stages of change, it was intended to moveclients from a state of precontemplation, throughthe ambivalence of contemplation, onto a point ofdecision and commitment to change. Five generalprinciples of motivational interviewing were specifiedby Miller and Rollnick (1991): (a) expressempathy through reflective listening, (b) developdiscrepancy between the client's goals and currentproblem behavior, (c) avoid argumentation anddirect confrontation, (d) roll with resistancerather than opposing it directly, and (e) supportself-efficacy for change.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
