The second theoretical perspective that answers the "should" question is the resource-based view
(RBV) of the firm. Wright and Snell and various colleagues argue that this view has emerged as
perhaps the most predominant theoretical perspective (Wright, Dunford, & Snell, 2001; Morris,
Snell, & Wright, 2006). They feel that it is particularly attractive to SIHRM researchers because it
focuses on the execution of various strategies and draws attention to the potential value of a firm's
internal asset stocks in this task. As seen earlier in the chapter, SIHRM contingency frameworks
have introduced the RBV perspective in connection with top management attitudes regarding the
transfer of HRM policies and practices abroad (Taylor et al., 1996).
The second theoretical perspective that answers the "should" question is the resource-based view(RBV) of the firm. Wright and Snell and various colleagues argue that this view has emerged asperhaps the most predominant theoretical perspective (Wright, Dunford, & Snell, 2001; Morris,Snell, & Wright, 2006). They feel that it is particularly attractive to SIHRM researchers because itfocuses on the execution of various strategies and draws attention to the potential value of a firm'sinternal asset stocks in this task. As seen earlier in the chapter, SIHRM contingency frameworkshave introduced the RBV perspective in connection with top management attitudes regarding thetransfer of HRM policies and practices abroad (Taylor et al., 1996).
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..