Differences After Treatment and
Intervention/Treatment Periods
Table 2 shows the changes in consumption of food and nutrient
groups, OS biomarkers, body weight,
and BMI between T0 and T1. The IG
significantly increased its intake of
FV whereas the CG did not. The
study's final assessment (T1) revealed
that mean FV intake in the IG was
748.2 g (confidence interval, 397–
941.1) whereas it was 494.6 g (confi-
dence interval, 333.9–766.3) in the
CG (data not shown). This result
occurred mainly because of increased
fruit intake, although vegetable consumption also increased significantly
in the IG; there was no significant
change for fruits or vegetables in the
CG. A significant reduction in RPM
consumption was observed only in
the IG. The same result was found in
relation to energy and intake of proteins, total lipids, and saturated and
monounsaturated fats, which were
significantly reduced only in the IG.
However, after Bonferroni correction
the consumption of FV and fruit
increased significantly for IG (Table 2).
The LH and CP biomarkers
increased in the CG. No change was
observed in the IG. With respect to
the antioxidant biomarkers, antioxidant capacity was reduced only in the
IG. A significant increase in body
weight was observed only in the CG;
this value was nearly 2 times greater
than in the IG. A similar situation
was observed for BMI but in this case,
the increase in the CG was 3 times
greater than in the IG.
Table 3 lists the crude value difference in which FV intake was 70% to
Differences After Treatment andIntervention/Treatment PeriodsTable 2 shows the changes in consumption of food and nutrientgroups, OS biomarkers, body weight,and BMI between T0 and T1. The IGsignificantly increased its intake ofFV whereas the CG did not. Thestudy's final assessment (T1) revealedthat mean FV intake in the IG was748.2 g (confidence interval, 397–941.1) whereas it was 494.6 g (confi-dence interval, 333.9–766.3) in theCG (data not shown). This resultoccurred mainly because of increasedfruit intake, although vegetable consumption also increased significantlyin the IG; there was no significantchange for fruits or vegetables in theCG. A significant reduction in RPMconsumption was observed only inthe IG. The same result was found inrelation to energy and intake of proteins, total lipids, and saturated andmonounsaturated fats, which weresignificantly reduced only in the IG.However, after Bonferroni correctionthe consumption of FV and fruitincreased significantly for IG (Table 2).The LH and CP biomarkersincreased in the CG. No change wasobserved in the IG. With respect tothe antioxidant biomarkers, antioxidant capacity was reduced only in theIG. A significant increase in bodyweight was observed only in the CG;this value was nearly 2 times greaterthan in the IG. A similar situationwas observed for BMI but in this case,the increase in the CG was 3 timesgreater than in the IG.Table 3 lists the crude value difference in which FV intake was 70% to
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
