In this dissertation, I wanted to write about peoples’ ideas and experiences of
deforestation such that points of agreement and disagreement may become a focus of
discussion towards resolving a human perceived problem. This was not an easy task. The
use of a single perspective to evaluate the relations between deforestation and human
activity was not satisfactory. Moreover, today’s discourses about deforestation using
single reference points, for example political or ecological, can become so loud that it
tends to drown out all the others. Confronted by the visual changes on the landscape, the
changes in social and environmental relations, and the dominating logic of scientific
management and national governance, people are often challenged in how they can talk.
In this dissertation, I wanted to write about peoples’ ideas and experiences ofdeforestation such that points of agreement and disagreement may become a focus ofdiscussion towards resolving a human perceived problem. This was not an easy task. Theuse of a single perspective to evaluate the relations between deforestation and humanactivity was not satisfactory. Moreover, today’s discourses about deforestation usingsingle reference points, for example political or ecological, can become so loud that ittends to drown out all the others. Confronted by the visual changes on the landscape, thechanges in social and environmental relations, and the dominating logic of scientificmanagement and national governance, people are often challenged in how they can talk.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..