Conclusion
From the study on the relationship between the costs
for healthcare and prevention of work-related accidents,
injuries and illnesses and the treatment costs for workrelated
accidents, injuries and illnesses in the group of
rubber tappers, it was found that the amount spent for
healthcare and prevention in the sample group did not
reduce the treatment costs incurred when having workrelated
accidents, injuries and illnesses. Considering the
study on the difference of the treatment costs of workrelated
accidents, injuries and illnesses before and after
the implementation of the health promotion program, it is
proved that the treatment cost incurred after the program
implementation was less than that before the implementation
significantly. It is confirmed that the proportion of
injured subjects after the program implementation was
significantly less than that before the implementation.