higher than in MMP1 and MMP2. Our results show that the sums of
the 3 families of FAs followed similar trends to those found in the
corresponding types of GB used in their elaboration. Comparatively,
MMP3 showed the lowest proportion of SFA and the highest of
MUFA and PUFA.
The fat quality was evaluated through the relationships between
the three families of fatty acids (Fig. 1). Comparatively, the highest
values of (MUFA þ PUFA)/SFA and PUFA/SFA were obtained in
MMP3 and MMP4.
Fig. 1 also provides information about the fat quality from the
four MMP through different indexes: AI, TI and H/H. These values
differed significantly between the four MMP due to the type of GB
used in their preparation. Comparatively, the MMP3 and MMP4
showed the lowest values of AI and IT and the highest of H/H.
The sensory analysis results of the four MMP analyzed are
presented in Fig. 2. On a scale of 1e9, all samples obtained an
overall acceptability over 7. Any significant differences between the