2.5. Statistical analyses
SPSS Software 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago) was used for all analyses. The
normality of all variables was assessed with a Shapiro–Wilk test and the
Q–Q plots were visually inspected. A one-factor repeated measures
ANOVA for mixed design (aerobic, resistance and control) with one
between subject factor (sex) was used to assess the effects of exercise
modality on EI, TEE, NEAT, PEEC, macronutrient intake and posture
allocation. A repeated measures ANOVA with one within-subject factor
[effect of condition (aerobic, resistance and control)] and one between
subject factor (sex) was used to compare appetite scores. Pairedsample
t-tests were used for post hoc comparisons with a Bonferroni
adjustment of the significance level for multiple comparisons (3 comparisons).
Paired-sample t-tests were used to compare the ExEE, exercise
duration and perceived exertion of the two exercise sessions
(aerobic and resistance). A Pearson correlation was used to compare
the PEEC of the resistance and aerobic sessions. Independent t-tests
were used to compare subject characteristics between sexes. Effects
were considered significant at P b 0.05. Results are presented as
means ± standard deviations.
2.5. Statistical analyses
SPSS Software 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago) was used for all analyses. The
normality of all variables was assessed with a Shapiro–Wilk test and the
Q–Q plots were visually inspected. A one-factor repeated measures
ANOVA for mixed design (aerobic, resistance and control) with one
between subject factor (sex) was used to assess the effects of exercise
modality on EI, TEE, NEAT, PEEC, macronutrient intake and posture
allocation. A repeated measures ANOVA with one within-subject factor
[effect of condition (aerobic, resistance and control)] and one between
subject factor (sex) was used to compare appetite scores. Pairedsample
t-tests were used for post hoc comparisons with a Bonferroni
adjustment of the significance level for multiple comparisons (3 comparisons).
Paired-sample t-tests were used to compare the ExEE, exercise
duration and perceived exertion of the two exercise sessions
(aerobic and resistance). A Pearson correlation was used to compare
the PEEC of the resistance and aerobic sessions. Independent t-tests
were used to compare subject characteristics between sexes. Effects
were considered significant at P b 0.05. Results are presented as
means ± standard deviations.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
