relation is “exercises sovereignty over.” In the social contract
state, the people must be both sovereign and subject.
In Rousseau, three things seem to be inseparable: freedom
(nondomination), the absence of differentiated roles, and a
very tight common purpose. We must all be dependent on
the general will, lest there arise bilateral forms of dependence.
28 This has been the formula for the most terrible
forms of homogenizing tyranny, starting with the Jacobins
and extending to the totalitarian regimes of our century. But
even where the third element of the trinity is set aside, the
aligning of equal freedom with the absence of differentiation
has remained a tempting mode of thought. Wherever it
reigns, be it in modes of feminist thought or of liberal politics,
the margin to recognize difference is very small.
relation is “exercises sovereignty over.” In the social contractstate, the people must be both sovereign and subject.In Rousseau, three things seem to be inseparable: freedom(nondomination), the absence of differentiated roles, and avery tight common purpose. We must all be dependent onthe general will, lest there arise bilateral forms of dependence.28 This has been the formula for the most terribleforms of homogenizing tyranny, starting with the Jacobinsand extending to the totalitarian regimes of our century. Buteven where the third element of the trinity is set aside, thealigning of equal freedom with the absence of differentiationhas remained a tempting mode of thought. Wherever itreigns, be it in modes of feminist thought or of liberal politics,the margin to recognize difference is very small.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..