In accordance with the distance moved in the arena, rats administered 0.0 g/kg of ethanol did not differ in total activity, i.e., total number of zone visits, over time (Fig. 2B).
Animals administered the 0.5 g/kg dose had significantly lower total activity from the fourth 5-min period and onward relative to the first 5 min. Compared to the respective initial 5 min, animals receiving ethanol at 1.0 g/kg and 1.5 g/kg had significantly lower total activity from the second 5-min period and onward. Significant between-group differences were found from the first time period (Fig. 2B).
Animals administered the 1.5 g/kg dose had lower total activity compared to the 0.5 g/kg dose during all time periods and lower activity relative to the 0.0 g/kg dose from the second time period and onward.
Animals receiving the 1.0 g/kg dose had significantly lower total activity compared to the 0.0 g/kg and 0.5 g/kg doses
during the third, fifth, and sixth time period.
In accordance with the distance moved in the arena, rats administered 0.0 g/kg of ethanol did not differ in total activity, i.e., total number of zone visits, over time (Fig. 2B). Animals administered the 0.5 g/kg dose had significantly lower total activity from the fourth 5-min period and onward relative to the first 5 min. Compared to the respective initial 5 min, animals receiving ethanol at 1.0 g/kg and 1.5 g/kg had significantly lower total activity from the second 5-min period and onward. Significant between-group differences were found from the first time period (Fig. 2B).Animals administered the 1.5 g/kg dose had lower total activity compared to the 0.5 g/kg dose during all time periods and lower activity relative to the 0.0 g/kg dose from the second time period and onward. Animals receiving the 1.0 g/kg dose had significantly lower total activity compared to the 0.0 g/kg and 0.5 g/kg dosesduring the third, fifth, and sixth time period.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..