As one of the largest banner advertising As sites of banner ads arranges the plac DoubleClick works in the world. Like many ot er Web sites, DoubleClick uses cookies, which are small text files placed om Veb client computers, to identify returning visitors. Most visitors fi the privacy risk posed by cookies to be acceptable. The Web servers cookies on the example, place at Amazon.com visitors ognized when they return. This can be useful, visitors to the when a visitor who has placed several items in a shopping eart before being interrupted example return to Amazon.com later in the day and find the shopping cart intact. The Amazon.com Web server ean read the ent's Amazon.com cookie and find the shopping cart from the client's previous session. The Amazon.com server can read only its own coolties, it cannot read the cookies placed on the ent computer by any other Web server scenario and what differences between the Amazon.com There are two important happens when DoubleClick serves a banner ad. First, the visitor usually does not know that he banner ad is coming from DoubleClick (and thus, does not know that the Doubleoliek server could be writing a cookie to the client computer). Second, DoubleClick serves ads through Web sites owned by thousands of companies. As a visitor moves from one Web site to another, that visitor's computer can collect many DoubleClick cookies. The DoubleClick server can read all of its own cookies, gathering information from each one about which ads were served and the sites through which they were served. Thus, DoubleClick can compile a tremendous amount of information about a user's actions on the Web is amount of information collection would not trouble most people. Double ck can use the cookies to track a particular computers connections to Web sites, but it does not record any identity information about the owner of that computer. Therefore accumulates a considerable record of Web activity, but ca ot oonueet that DoubleClick activity with a person In 1999, DoubleClick arranged a B1.7 billion merger with Abacus Direct Corpo tion, Abacus had developed a way to link information about people's Web behavior (col lected through cookies such as those placed by DoubleOliek's banner ad servers) to mes, addresses, and other information about those people that had been collected in an offline consumer database The reaction from online privacy protection groups was immediate ai substuntial. The FTC launched an investigation, the Internet's privacy issues e-mail lists and chat ooms buzzed with furious conversation and, in the end, DoubleClick abandoned its data with the identity information the Abacus plans to integrate its cookie-generated largest ba a DoubleClick networks, it database. Although had been counting on generating additional revenue by using the information in combined database th hat it was unable to create When the FTC probe concluded two years later, DoubleClick was not eharged with any violatio of laws or regulations. The lesson here is that a company violates Internet community's ethical standards at its own peril, even if the transgression does not break any laws
As one of the largest banner advertising As sites of banner ads arranges the plac DoubleClick works in the world. Like many ot er Web sites, DoubleClick uses cookies, which are small text files placed om Veb client computers, to identify returning visitors. Most visitors fi the privacy risk posed by cookies to be acceptable. The Web servers cookies on the example, place at Amazon.com visitors ognized when they return. This can be useful, visitors to the when a visitor who has placed several items in a shopping eart before being interrupted example return to Amazon.com later in the day and find the shopping cart intact. The Amazon.com Web server ean read the ent's Amazon.com cookie and find the shopping cart from the client's previous session. The Amazon.com server can read only its own coolties, it cannot read the cookies placed on the ent computer by any other Web server scenario and what differences between the Amazon.com There are two important happens when DoubleClick serves a banner ad. First, the visitor usually does not know that he banner ad is coming from DoubleClick (and thus, does not know that the Doubleoliek server could be writing a cookie to the client computer). Second, DoubleClick serves ads through Web sites owned by thousands of companies. As a visitor moves from one Web site to another, that visitor's computer can collect many DoubleClick cookies. The DoubleClick server can read all of its own cookies, gathering information from each one about which ads were served and the sites through which they were served. Thus, DoubleClick can compile a tremendous amount of information about a user's actions on the Web is amount of information collection would not trouble most people. Double ck can use the cookies to track a particular computers connections to Web sites, but it does not record any identity information about the owner of that computer. Therefore accumulates a considerable record of Web activity, but ca ot oonueet that DoubleClick activity with a person In 1999, DoubleClick arranged a B1.7 billion merger with Abacus Direct Corpo tion, Abacus had developed a way to link information about people's Web behavior (col lected through cookies such as those placed by DoubleOliek's banner ad servers) to mes, addresses, and other information about those people that had been collected in an offline consumer database The reaction from online privacy protection groups was immediate ai substuntial. The FTC launched an investigation, the Internet's privacy issues e-mail lists and chat ooms buzzed with furious conversation and, in the end, DoubleClick abandoned its data with the identity information the Abacus plans to integrate its cookie-generated largest ba a DoubleClick networks, it database. Although had been counting on generating additional revenue by using the information in combined database th hat it was unable to create When the FTC probe concluded two years later, DoubleClick was not eharged with any violatio of laws or regulations. The lesson here is that a company violates Internet community's ethical standards at its own peril, even if the transgression does not break any laws
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
