At that time landlords lived essentially from the revenues of their landed properties (benefice or usufruct),
so the foundation of such domains by the Kings worked to the financial detriment of the landlord in whose territory the domainwas located.
Therefore the practical result was that under the cover of spiritual achievement through the establishment of religious foundations, the Kings again deprived troublesome vassals of precious sources of incomes. As the foundations were established for noble religious reasons, any protestation or opposition would have resulted in a severe loss of merit to the protesting landlords,
Rakais or Rakryans who were thus totally cornered. Their views on the religious foundations were irrelevant, as whether they accepted or rejected their establishment, they lost either wealth or merit.