More often, given that some motivation was present to encourage or to force one
native to hear the words of some other, the two interactants hold some prior
impressions or knowledge of the other party, and of that party's community. That
motivation may stem from a sense of historical similarity, or the belief that the two
parties share some interest such as religion or business needs. Or it may arise out of
a perceived competition for the same scarce resources.
Actions based on the perception of competitive difference or threat seldom reach a
stage of disinterested inquiry or goodwill that mark the idealized case. In the face of
conflict, the parties may find the need to deal with the other in the interest of
preventing warfare or of lowering the level of hostilities between the communities. In
this latter case, a third party enters the equation.
More often, given that some motivation was present to encourage or to force one
native to hear the words of some other, the two interactants hold some prior
impressions or knowledge of the other party, and of that party's community. That
motivation may stem from a sense of historical similarity, or the belief that the two
parties share some interest such as religion or business needs. Or it may arise out of
a perceived competition for the same scarce resources.
Actions based on the perception of competitive difference or threat seldom reach a
stage of disinterested inquiry or goodwill that mark the idealized case. In the face of
conflict, the parties may find the need to deal with the other in the interest of
preventing warfare or of lowering the level of hostilities between the communities. In
this latter case, a third party enters the equation.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
