Where contradictions exist between macroeconomic, sectoral, technological or other green economy approaches on the one hand, and social goals and programmes on the other, the latter are rarely prioritized. In contexts where underlying structures of inequality are entrenched and persistent, whether along lines of class, gender, ethnicity or other factors, these are unlikely to be challenged, and may indeed be reinforced, by residual and compensatory social policy approaches. For example, despite integrating social protection (such as direct cash transfers) into some REDD schemes in Brazil, these have still been shown to involve unjust trade-offs with the well-being of indigenous or other peoples. In Australia this is also a concern, as indigenous groups do not automatically benefit from PES schemes.