The fact that an aspect of Weber’s view was an insistence on the plurality
of values, even of contradictory or incommensurable ones, does not undermine
the evaluations which are integral to explanations of behavior, nor imply that
Weber should not countenance such evaluations. Some commentators (for
example, Oakes [1998]), have argued that Weber’s methodology would be
fundamentally at odds with itself in these ways. However, Weber regularly
provides explanations that encompass these elements, often by revealing how
humanly meaningful goals and goods come at the expense of others. The
explanation that roots capitalism in the Protestant ethic is an example of this,
as at times, in ways just discussed, are his diagnoses of appeals to the standard
sense of economic rationality.
The fact that an aspect of Weber’s view was an insistence on the plurality
of values, even of contradictory or incommensurable ones, does not undermine
the evaluations which are integral to explanations of behavior, nor imply that
Weber should not countenance such evaluations. Some commentators (for
example, Oakes [1998]), have argued that Weber’s methodology would be
fundamentally at odds with itself in these ways. However, Weber regularly
provides explanations that encompass these elements, often by revealing how
humanly meaningful goals and goods come at the expense of others. The
explanation that roots capitalism in the Protestant ethic is an example of this,
as at times, in ways just discussed, are his diagnoses of appeals to the standard
sense of economic rationality.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..