there is another point important to our exploration of the genealogy of human nature in neoclassical theory as we discussed above the notions of passions and power are inextricably linked in hobbes's work do we see a similar link in neoclassical theory If we follow hobbes's conception of power as anything that is enabling for the satisfaction of our passions the neoclassical conception (of human behaviour) too has an implicit notion of power which is associated with the notion of property labouring human being sell their labour power i.e. their property in a way to maximise their utility the satisfaction of their passions Owners of capital too behave similarly they will offer the use of their property which is the source of their power with a view to maximising their utility therefore human beings will do whatever is in their power to satisfy their passions similarly to the range of passions confined to the realm of property ownership nevertheless it seems thus far that both the hobbesian and the neoclassical individual are possessive individualists (Macpherson 1979) seeking the acquisition of the objects of their passions relentlessly