interaction is imposed by a person with a certain status (psychologist). Based on the literature on non-verbal interactions, it is recommended that, in case it happens, to let the person being evaluated to display such seductive behavior (but, from ethical reasons, not to encourage such a display), because it might provide important indicators about the personality, mood, intellectual level, interests and emotional flexibility of the interviewee. Also, by using this new technique, i.e. intrusive behavior displayed by the evaluator, psychologists might be able to identify whether the behavior displayed is one which is an internalized one, based on personality traits, social skills that have been developed over time and manifests itself visible, or whether the seductive display has been used in a non-genuine way and might have some context-dependent manipulative intentions behind them. In order to perform an objective psychological evaluation, as well as to avoid manipulative seductive behavior displayed by the woman interviewee, we suggest three ways the psychologists might manage such behavior (prevent or stop it after its apparition): 1. Visual inspection - the psychologist dominates the speaker (in the context of communication) by maintaining a continuous gaze until the other gives in gazing. This will stop when the psychologist notices signs of stress or aggression at the interviewed person. The aim is to rebalance positions and identify the individual's authentic behavior. 2. Questions confirming the dominant behavior vs. defensive behavior - this technique is a simple observation of the behavior of the prisoner in a tense situation, emotionally charged, with the aim of creating a position of superiority in relation to it. Both behaviors shown (dominant/defense) are most likely non-authentic at that time, probably being governed by emotions, by the desire to lead or to leave a good impression (i.e. social desirability), by fear of the unknown, surprise, anxiety, or even by helplessness (Example 1 and Example 2). Example 1: behavior of superiority and dominance from the part of the female interviewee ė Psychologistÿs question: "Do you feel vulnerable at this time?" The answer of the female interviewee: "Oh ... no, no ... this is how I am now ... a little uneasy....” Example 2: defensive behavior of the interviewed ė Psychologistÿs question: "Are you okay, I realize that you are excited, is it true?" The answer of the female intervieweefollows immediately, in a fearful and low intensity voice: "Yes ... I do not know what will happen to me, I fear it a little bit." 3. Controlling the distance from each other – In the initial assessment, one can manipulate the distance between psychologist and the interviewee. The aim is to identify the reactions of the other. Depending on the behaviors displayed, one can create controlled tense situations, either embarrassing the other or being supportive to the other person. The dynamic of the social distance from the interviewee also depends on several other variables initially identified based on standards assessments, such as depression, self-esteem, lack of social support etc.