There are different soilless cropping models, all of which require more or less complex technology. This system has a series of advantages and drawbacks when compared with traditional production in soil. Among the most outstanding advantages are higher efficiency in the use of protection factors, above all irrigation water, fertilizers, and other chemical and plant protection products (Van Os,1999). In closed systems, the filtered waste can be collected and disinfected, avoiding environmental pollution (Garibaldi et al.,2003). Furthermore, both quality and production of yields are increased if considered in terms of the commercial parameters for caliber, shape, uniform size, and shine. Moreover, sales planning is improved given increased regularity of production and an extended offer period. Among the drawbacks of soilless cultivation, the most important is the strong investment required given that greenhouses must be more automated, especially in fertirrigation. Regarding climatic control, if one wishes to protect the crop from the sharp drops in temperature and extend the production calendar, it may be necessary to install some type of heating system. Such equipment also demands a continuous energy supply, which in turn increases production costs. There is an increase in residues as a result of the plastics habitually used in greenhouses and the plant waste matter as well as the remains of artificial substrate and the final filtered wastes from the drainage water, making it essential to establish collection and recycling systems. Finally, management of the installations requires farmers to have special training while simultaneously generating greater dependency on technology, which may exclude possible use by farmers who are less motivated and less well prepared.