Our findings with respect to most elements of feasibility suggest that the New Brunswick
Intervention for Health Enhancement After Leaving shows promise and warrants further efficacy testing. However, modifications to both the New Brunswick Intervention for Health Enhancement After Leaving and the research design would be essential. Lessons learned regarding adaptations for some survivors provide direction for modifying the Intervention for Health Enhancement After Leaving content and process. Consideration of ways the Intervention for Health Enhancement After Leaving might better support improvement in women’s physical health also isneeded. Costs will need to be reduced without compromising
Intervention for Health Enhancement After Leaving acceptability or efficacy. To enable more complete cost comparisons, more complete documentation of pre-post intervention health service use is required. A central argument for developing the Intervention for Health Enhancement After Leaving was the cost of health care attributable to violence; hence, realistic costanalysis needs to include not only the delivery costs butalso the changes in system costs over time. Additional design changes could include using a different measure of physical health and adding a 12-month post-intervention follow-up (18 months from baseline) to capture delayed gains or losses.