As a psychological journey, based on the book the King would have a chance at going to experience the same as the first group of tourists. Access to the tourist attractions of the version 2 makes the attraction in the area. Start the expansion grows, because they have access to more than. Local residents began to look for ways to benefit from tourists by offering services or products that are provided to local tourists. A wide range of economic activity started to expand in response to the growing quantity of visitors to tourism. At the same time. Local governments also need to update the various infrastructure development needs, whether it's electrical system, plumbing and road systems, eliminate waste or waste water treatment system and security protection systems, etc. Enough to this phase.
ventures return home, they talk with friends and relatives about the best new spots they have discovered. Among those friends and relatives, the near-venturers, determined by their person- ality characteristics, visit the intriguing place they had just heard about. As shown in the normal distribution curve, there are far more near-venturers than venturers. When demand increases due to a large volume of near-ven- turer arrivals, local people become optimistic about the future of tourism and develop hotels, restaurants, shops selling native tems and other services In turn, when the near-venturers return home satisfied with the destination, they pass the message to their mid-centric friends. As a result, even greater demand is created. How- ever, because the centrics seldom sway the opinions of ventures or near-ventures, they pass their views only to followers (i.e. the near- dependable and dependable). Along with the development, the destination gradually takes on a more touristy look, which is more appealing to dependables but unattractive to ventures. Following this curve, the fact that the popularity of a destination first rises and then declines can be explained. By presenting the above scenario, Plog (2001) argues that the ideal psychographic positioning for most destinations lies some- where in the middle of the near-venturer seg ment. If a destination's planners understand the psychographic curve, they can control tourism development and maintain an ideal market position.
Although generally well known in tourism research (Smith, 1990), Plog's theory imparts little understanding of tourist motivation or predicting of tourist behaviour. Some research- ers criticize Plog's theory because tourists travel with different motivations on different occasions (e.g. Andreu et al., 2005). For exam- ple, holidaymakers may take a winter skiing break in an allocentric destination; however, they still take their main holiday to a psycho- centric destination. McKercher (2005) criti- cizes the validity of Plog's model by arguing that each tourist drawn to a destination has a unique relationship with the destination and that a destination can be seen to exist at multiple stages along Plog's allocentric/psychocentric continuum simultaneously. Thus, an appropri- ate approach to label Plog's model may be a form of tourist role and lifestyle typology. However, compared with other forms of tourist typology, Plog's model provides more explana- tions of tourist motivation.