How explicit should descriptions of tragedy be? Some journalists argue that the public needs to see the graphic effects of war or violent crime to fully understand a story. Others believe that additional principles should be considered. Where would you draw the line? Would you show the mangled body of a victim of a faraway war? The mangled body of the victim of a local car accident? If you answers to these question are different, how would you explain the difference to your audience? on what values would you base your decisions? If Immanuel Kant had an opinion about such depictions, what do you think it would be?