In summary, science should again focus on what questions students have and indications of how they can be used in new situations. Interestingly, however, most scientists are pleased to define science without such “disciplines”. Certainly students should be the thinkers, the doers, and the arguers with their own brains. Most now agree on this broad definition for science. To summarize the important meaning of STEM reforms we again need to use language for defining science as in NSTA’s official position statement: both science and technology are human endeavors and involve similar basic procedures, science involves exploration of the natural world seeking explanations – based on evidence – for objects and events encountered, and technology focuses on the human-made world. Such reform efforts are essential if real reforms are to succeed around the world. Perhaps 2015 will be the major success year that produces graduates with STEM experiences where they see something students do on their own.