Managers and management researchers tend to assume that learning from strategic events yields benefits.
Although some firms have gained competitive advantages from learning, instances are infrequent, and firms
that have gained persistent advantages through learning are probably quite unusual. Learning from successes
has short-run benefits but eventually makes firms less capable of surviving, whereas learning from failures
disappears in clouds of rationalization and defensive behavior. Noisy feedback about results causes people
to develop very heterogeneous and often highly erroneous perceptions of firms and their environments, so it
should not be surprising that strategizing is harmful as often as it is helpful.
© 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.