Masculinity is frequently cited as a potential reason why men are more likely than women to complete suicide.
There has been less work exploring why this may be the case, and in particular, why men in certain social
positions seem more vulnerable to suicide. In this paper I review a broad range of social scientific literature in
order to elaborate upon and contextualise the suggestion that masculine identities and expressions contribute
to men’s greater propensity for completing suicide. I do this in two ways. First, I examine the situated nature of
masculinities, particularly in terms of socio-economic context. I introduce research which has identified the
different ways in which masculinities are expressed through employment, unemployment and fatherhood.
This section demonstrates that, for men in lower socio-economic groups, opportunities for masculine
expression may be constrained by both opportunity and socio-cultural expectations. This heightens the chance
that men in such positions have of ‘failing’ to achieve an acceptable masculinity. I then turn to the ways in
which masculinities are expressed through bodily means, elaborating on the claim that many masculine
practices ‘damage bodies’. I examine some of these practices, including fighting, health-related behaviours, and
alcohol and drug use. Additionally, I address the claim that masculinity is especially associated with physicality.
I problematise this, while suggesting that cultural expectations of masculinities do appear frequently to
incorporate an approach towards bodies which is ‘risky’. Leading from this I discuss some of the ways in which
suicide itself could be understood as an especially damaging physical expression of masculinity