has also concluded that trust is not
completely rational. She describes three kinds of trust which
are not fully rational. The first kind occurs when, "we trust
people because we can't check all the bases for belief. So we
accept, or rather assume, that what they say is true" [Baker,
1987, p.l]. We do this not only out of convenience, but also
because those who are overly suspicious are subject to the
adverse judgements of other people, i.e., they are viewed as
morally suspect themselves [Baker, 1987]. "A second kind of
trust involves more than our willingness to accept people or
to assume things on trust. It is exemplified in cases when we
do not look for references or confirmation because 'the person
looks honest' or 'seems very decent'" [Baker, 1987, p.2]
has also concluded that trust is not
completely rational. She describes three kinds of trust which
are not fully rational. The first kind occurs when, "we trust
people because we can't check all the bases for belief. So we
accept, or rather assume, that what they say is true" [Baker,
1987, p.l]. We do this not only out of convenience, but also
because those who are overly suspicious are subject to the
adverse judgements of other people, i.e., they are viewed as
morally suspect themselves [Baker, 1987]. "A second kind of
trust involves more than our willingness to accept people or
to assume things on trust. It is exemplified in cases when we
do not look for references or confirmation because 'the person
looks honest' or 'seems very decent'" [Baker, 1987, p.2]
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
