C. Data Abstraction and Data Management
The research team will create data-abstraction forms for the KQs. Based on their clinical and methodological expertise, a pair of researchers will be assigned to abstract data from each of the eligible articles. One researcher will abstract the data, and the second will over-read the article and the accompanying abstraction to check for accuracy and completeness. Disagreements will be resolved by consensus or by obtaining a third reviewer’s opinion if consensus cannot be reached. Guidance documents will be drafted and provided to the researchers to aid both reproducibility and standardization of data collection.
We will design the data-abstraction forms for this project to collect the data required to evaluate the specified eligibility criteria for inclusion in this review, as well as demographic and other data needed for determining outcomes (intermediate, final, and adverse events outcomes). We will pay particular attention to describing the details of the intervention (e.g., NPPV interface), patient characteristics (e.g., etiology of respiratory failure), and study design (e.g., efficacy-effectiveness spectrum using the PRECIS instrument21) that may be related to outcomes. In addition, we will describe comparators carefully (especially supportive therapy), as treatment standards may have changed during the study period. The safety outcomes will be framed to help identify adverse events, including aspiration, secondary infections, and facial ulcerations. Data necessary for assessing quality and applicability, as described in the General Methods Guide,20 will also be abstracted. Before they are used, abstraction-form templates will be pilot-tested with a sample of included articles to ensure that all relevant data elements are captured and that there is consistency/reproducibility between abstractors. Forms will be revised as necessary before full abstraction of all included articles.
C. ข้อมูล Abstraction และจัดการข้อมูลทีมวิจัยจะสร้างแบบฟอร์มข้อมูล abstraction ใน KQs ขึ้นอยู่กับความเชี่ยวชาญของคลินิก และ methodological คู่ของนักวิจัยจะให้ข้อมูลบทคัดย่อจากบทความมีสิทธิ์ นักวิจัยหนึ่งจะบทคัดย่อข้อมูล และวินาทีที่เกินจะอ่านบทความและ abstraction มาเพื่อตรวจสอบความถูกต้องและสมบูรณ์ ความขัดแย้งจะได้รับการแก้ไข ตามมติ หรือ โดยได้รับความเห็นของผู้ตรวจทานที่สามถ้ามติไม่สามารถเข้าถึง เอกสารคำแนะนำจะสามารถร่าง และให้กับนักวิจัยเพื่อช่วย reproducibility และมาตรฐานของการเก็บรวบรวมข้อมูลWe will design the data-abstraction forms for this project to collect the data required to evaluate the specified eligibility criteria for inclusion in this review, as well as demographic and other data needed for determining outcomes (intermediate, final, and adverse events outcomes). We will pay particular attention to describing the details of the intervention (e.g., NPPV interface), patient characteristics (e.g., etiology of respiratory failure), and study design (e.g., efficacy-effectiveness spectrum using the PRECIS instrument21) that may be related to outcomes. In addition, we will describe comparators carefully (especially supportive therapy), as treatment standards may have changed during the study period. The safety outcomes will be framed to help identify adverse events, including aspiration, secondary infections, and facial ulcerations. Data necessary for assessing quality and applicability, as described in the General Methods Guide,20 will also be abstracted. Before they are used, abstraction-form templates will be pilot-tested with a sample of included articles to ensure that all relevant data elements are captured and that there is consistency/reproducibility between abstractors. Forms will be revised as necessary before full abstraction of all included articles.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..