I The mean
and variability of the GHG was employed to calculate the CF using
SimaPro 7.3 (Table 6).
Considering the data shown in Tables 2e4, the results obtained
from the MC simulation may denote a low uncertainty using variations
in DMID, TDN and CP for the scenarios examined.
The reason for the moderate differences in CH4 enteric (Fig. 3)
was due to the forage and grass quality variation for the DMID
(Table 5), which was attributed to the specificity of the scenarios
analysed. The N2O N-fertiliser emissions oscillated from 57% to 82%
of total N2O emissions considering the amount of N synthetic
fertiliser applied ranging from 85 to 165 kg/ha in scenarios III, IV
and V.