Fig. 2. Changes in net assimilation rate of cut chrysanthemum ‘Zembla’ leaves subjected to different light treatments: (A) (SD: mixed RB light from 09:00 to 20:00 [white
width bar], then darkness from 20:00 to 09:00 [gray width bar]); (B) (SD + B: mixed RB light from 09:00 to 20:00 [white width bar], then B light from 20:00 to 24:00 [blue
width bar], and darkness from 24:00 to 09:00 [gray width bar]); (C) (LD + B: mixed RB light from 09:00 to 24:00 [white width bar], then B light from 24:00 to 04:00 [blue
width bar], and darkness from 04:00 to 09:00 [gray width bar]), and (D) (SD + CB: mixed RB light from 09:00 to 20:00 [white width bar], then B light from 20:00 to 09:00
[blue width bar]). Data represent means
±
S.E. of 4 measurements and different letters indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05)
Fig. 2. Changes in net assimilation rate of cut chrysanthemum ‘Zembla’ leaves subjected to different light treatments: (A) (SD: mixed RB light from 09:00 to 20:00 [whitewidth bar], then darkness from 20:00 to 09:00 [gray width bar]); (B) (SD + B: mixed RB light from 09:00 to 20:00 [white width bar], then B light from 20:00 to 24:00 [bluewidth bar], and darkness from 24:00 to 09:00 [gray width bar]); (C) (LD + B: mixed RB light from 09:00 to 24:00 [white width bar], then B light from 24:00 to 04:00 [bluewidth bar], and darkness from 04:00 to 09:00 [gray width bar]), and (D) (SD + CB: mixed RB light from 09:00 to 20:00 [white width bar], then B light from 20:00 to 09:00[blue width bar]). Data represent means±S.E. of 4 measurements and different letters indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05)
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..