Some question to guide you in critiquing and evaluating the article:
Was there anything that was left unfinished? Did the author raise question or make points that were left orphaned in the paper?
These questions are to make you think about what was in the article and what was left out.Since, by looking at the thesis statement, you should have a good idea of what the author is going to say, you should also be able to tell if any of the points weren’t explored as fully as others. In addition, in the course of the paper, the other might have raised other points to support the argument. Were all of those worked out thoroughly?