Dear K. Sopon
Please find attached the IWAY audit report, IWAY audit photo report (will send later in separate email) and some additional documents related to the non-conformities in Chapter 9.
The audit reports for both production units are registered in SRDB.
Please distribute the reports to the supplier and all concerned in your organization and follow up the immediate actions regarding the potential IWAY must 1.2
Result of the audit:
Royal Porcelain has very competent EHS team and IWAY is integrated in their management system. In general the result of the audit shows that IWAY is well understood and communicated to the workers. It was also noted that the supplier has good understanding about IWAY requirements in Environment, Chemicals, Health & Safety and Fire prevention.
- Potential IWAY Must => no business consequence at this time due to the special circumstance but high risk if not corrected
- 12 NOK
- IWAY Compliance rate – 88%
-
MAIN AREAS OF NOKs
1. There was a potential IWAY must 1.2 reported related to the migrant workers from Cambodia. The supplier has been asked to provide in 2 weeks after the audit a detailed information.
2. It was noted that the supplier is not in compliance with some of the points in Chapter 9 - 9.3 Employment contracts, 9.7 Wages, 9.8 Leave, 9.11 Legal compliance.
Clarification regarding deviation 9.3: During Intertek verification, CMG interviews with the management and the closing meeting there were discussions about the fact that 1500 workers are with temporary contracts. The supplier presented a permit from the authorities to hire these workers with an exception from the THAI law. The permit was granted 3 years ago and CMG requested Intertek to investigate what is the maximum period of validation of the permit. Acc. THAI law (see attachment “Labour Protection act Section 118”) the permit cannot exceed 2 years and the supplier is not in compliance to the legislation.
3. It was also noted that the housing facilities were not included in the IWAY scope, which leads to not sufficient implementation of chapter 10.
4. The audit team observed that the supplier needs to plan corrective actions related to capacity of the water treatment plants, to the sorting and storage of waste and to improve the emergency signs.
5. There were also noted some improvements in the area of machine/equipment safety and forklift charging areas in both factories.
For NOK points – please submit CAP file to K. Sarun within the normal time frame.
For potential IMUST 1.2 – please gather all the necessary information and submit by 9 December.
a. All recruitment fees break down
b. Paid by whom & how?
Dear K. Sopon
Please find attached the IWAY audit report, IWAY audit photo report (will send later in separate email) and some additional documents related to the non-conformities in Chapter 9.
The audit reports for both production units are registered in SRDB.
Please distribute the reports to the supplier and all concerned in your organization and follow up the immediate actions regarding the potential IWAY must 1.2
Result of the audit:
Royal Porcelain has very competent EHS team and IWAY is integrated in their management system. In general the result of the audit shows that IWAY is well understood and communicated to the workers. It was also noted that the supplier has good understanding about IWAY requirements in Environment, Chemicals, Health & Safety and Fire prevention.
- Potential IWAY Must => no business consequence at this time due to the special circumstance but high risk if not corrected
- 12 NOK
- IWAY Compliance rate – 88%
-
MAIN AREAS OF NOKs
1. There was a potential IWAY must 1.2 reported related to the migrant workers from Cambodia. The supplier has been asked to provide in 2 weeks after the audit a detailed information.
2. It was noted that the supplier is not in compliance with some of the points in Chapter 9 - 9.3 Employment contracts, 9.7 Wages, 9.8 Leave, 9.11 Legal compliance.
Clarification regarding deviation 9.3: During Intertek verification, CMG interviews with the management and the closing meeting there were discussions about the fact that 1500 workers are with temporary contracts. The supplier presented a permit from the authorities to hire these workers with an exception from the THAI law. The permit was granted 3 years ago and CMG requested Intertek to investigate what is the maximum period of validation of the permit. Acc. THAI law (see attachment “Labour Protection act Section 118”) the permit cannot exceed 2 years and the supplier is not in compliance to the legislation.
3. It was also noted that the housing facilities were not included in the IWAY scope, which leads to not sufficient implementation of chapter 10.
4. The audit team observed that the supplier needs to plan corrective actions related to capacity of the water treatment plants, to the sorting and storage of waste and to improve the emergency signs.
5. There were also noted some improvements in the area of machine/equipment safety and forklift charging areas in both factories.
For NOK points – please submit CAP file to K. Sarun within the normal time frame.
For potential IMUST 1.2 – please gather all the necessary information and submit by 9 December.
a. All recruitment fees break down
b. Paid by whom & how?
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..