This paper has examined the influence of personal attributes, organizational ethics position and other factors which were rules conformance, active participation in profession activities, ethics instructions received and understanding of the professional code of conduct on the Malaysian accountants’ judgment on questionable ethical scenarios. A total of 250 were distributed to accountants registered with the Malaysian Institute of Accountants. Of this number, 221 questionnaires were duly completed and returned. The main findings revealed from the analysis are that age, corporate ethics position, active participation in the profession activities and understanding of the professional code of conduct are significant influence of accountants’ judgments on ethical situations. Older accountants, corporations with higher ethics scale and accountants who understand the professional code of conduct are expected to be stricter in judging questionable ethical situations. In contrast, accountants who actively participate in the profession activities tend to be more acceptable to questionable scenarios. The results support Kohlberg’s (1973, 1981) theory of moral development which suggests that as individuals aged, their decision-makings will be influenced by ethical values. The findings also provide support to Hunt and Vitell’s (1986) model which proposes that organizational ethical climate is one of the environmental factors affecting ethical judgments.