Bread quality evaluation
Bread quality parameters included specific volume, crumb color,
acceptance and texture of crumb. Crumb color of the breads were
measured using the HunterLab calorimeter model MiniScan XE Plus
(Reston, USA). Lightness (L*), redness (þa*) or greenness (a*),
yellowness (þb*) or blueness (b*) were measured four times for
each loaf. The crumb firmness was determined on the central slices
from each bread loaf using a texture analyzer TA-XT plus (Stable
Micro Systems, Surrey, UK) according to Approved Method 74-09
(AACC, 2000). For each textural measurement, two slices from the
center of each bread loaf were used. Measurements from at least
three bread loaves were taken for each formulation.
Overall acceptability was carried out as follows: one slice of
bread, identified by code numbers, was served to each un-trained
panelist (n ¼ 20) under normal illumination. They evaluated each
bread for quality attributes: crumb color, aroma, taste, texture and
overall acceptability. Acceptability of each quality attribute was
rated with a score 1 (lowest) to 9 (highest). Products were
considered acceptable if their mean scores for overall acceptability
were above 5 (neither like nor dislike).
Bread quality evaluationBread quality parameters included specific volume, crumb color,acceptance and texture of crumb. Crumb color of the breads weremeasured using the HunterLab calorimeter model MiniScan XE Plus(Reston, USA). Lightness (L*), redness (þa*) or greenness (a*),yellowness (þb*) or blueness (b*) were measured four times foreach loaf. The crumb firmness was determined on the central slicesfrom each bread loaf using a texture analyzer TA-XT plus (StableMicro Systems, Surrey, UK) according to Approved Method 74-09(AACC, 2000). For each textural measurement, two slices from thecenter of each bread loaf were used. Measurements from at leastthree bread loaves were taken for each formulation.Overall acceptability was carried out as follows: one slice ofbread, identified by code numbers, was served to each un-trainedpanelist (n ¼ 20) under normal illumination. They evaluated eachbread for quality attributes: crumb color, aroma, taste, texture andoverall acceptability. Acceptability of each quality attribute wasrated with a score 1 (lowest) to 9 (highest). Products wereconsidered acceptable if their mean scores for overall acceptabilitywere above 5 (neither like nor dislike).
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98aba/98abadb1435b0cfbe63f2dabdddc22693678da81" alt=""