The women’s sample in this study was approximately three times as large as the men’s sample. As a result, certain analyses resulted in statistical significance among women and not among men where the value of the statistic was comparable. Namely, the correlation between physical sensations and depressive symptoms, r = .19, was not significant among men whereas the correlations between social concerns and depression, r = .17, and social concerns and worry, r = .15 were significant in the women’s sample. It is useful to interpret these correlations in terms of effect size rather than relying on null hypothesis testing. In these instances, one can conclude that the magnitude of the correlations between physical sensations and depressive symptoms in men and social concerns and depression and worry in woman are small in effect size (Cohen & Cohen, 1983) and thus comparable. It is recommend that future studies aim to balance the sample size when examining equivalence between two groups and report the effect size of their statistical findings.