describes hydrological and economic information through a set of standard tables and has also some supplementary tables to cover social aspects (UN, 2007). The SEEAW accounting includes precipitation, soil water and refers to natural evapotranspiration as one cause of decreasing water stocks. The SEEAW separates consumptive use from non-consumptive use, thus, allows for a wider range of water resources and uses to be included. The SEEAW approach provides comprehensive flow accounting and a well-documented way of presenting links to non-agricultural elements of the economy.However, its applicability for water stock accounting is in question mainly because key required data are unlikely to be available (Perry, 2012). The SEEAW as suggested by Perry (2012) should be expanded to accommodate natural landscape and agriculture, which are typically the major water users in river basins. The SEEAW, for example, describes
water input from precipitation, and total evapotranspiration, but does not describe rainfall partitioning through the different water uses and evapotranspiration pathways characterised
by different land use classes and the benefits that result from that. The essential difference in green and blue water resources (Falkenmark and Rockstr¨om, 2006; Rockstr¨om and Gordon, 2001) is not recognised in the SEEAW framework.
describes hydrological and economic information through a set of standard tables and has also some supplementary tables to cover social aspects (UN, 2007). The SEEAW accounting includes precipitation, soil water and refers to natural evapotranspiration as one cause of decreasing water stocks. The SEEAW separates consumptive use from non-consumptive use, thus, allows for a wider range of water resources and uses to be included. The SEEAW approach provides comprehensive flow accounting and a well-documented way of presenting links to non-agricultural elements of the economy.However, its applicability for water stock accounting is in question mainly because key required data are unlikely to be available (Perry, 2012). The SEEAW as suggested by Perry (2012) should be expanded to accommodate natural landscape and agriculture, which are typically the major water users in river basins. The SEEAW, for example, describeswater input from precipitation, and total evapotranspiration, but does not describe rainfall partitioning through the different water uses and evapotranspiration pathways characterisedby different land use classes and the benefits that result from that. The essential difference in green and blue water resources (Falkenmark and Rockstr¨om, 2006; Rockstr¨om and Gordon, 2001) is not recognised in the SEEAW framework.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
