: LAB and bifidobacteria inhibited the growth of S. aureus, with percentage of growth inhibition
ranging from 0.5% to 34.2%. All strains demonstrated a drastic reduction (p < 0.05) in growth inhibition
upon neutralization. Antimicrobial compounds in the CFS were lactic acid, acetic acid, hydrogen
peroxide, and diacetyl. The CFS of strain Lactobacillus bulgaricus FTDC 8611 significantly hindered
(p < 0.05) the biofilm formation of S. aureus. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 19.0.
Conclusion: LAB were able to produce antimicrobial compounds that inhibit S. aureus. The inhibitory
action of the CFS was mainly due to the organic acids produced by LAB. Antimicrobial metabolites
produced by LAB comprise lactic acid, acetic acid, hydrogen peroxide, and diacetyl. S. aureus was able to
form a biofilm, which was successfully inhibited by the CFS of L. bulgaricus FTDC 8611.
: LAB and bifidobacteria inhibited the growth of S. aureus, with percentage of growth inhibitionranging from 0.5% to 34.2%. All strains demonstrated a drastic reduction (p < 0.05) in growth inhibitionupon neutralization. Antimicrobial compounds in the CFS were lactic acid, acetic acid, hydrogenperoxide, and diacetyl. The CFS of strain Lactobacillus bulgaricus FTDC 8611 significantly hindered(p < 0.05) the biofilm formation of S. aureus. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 19.0.Conclusion: LAB were able to produce antimicrobial compounds that inhibit S. aureus. The inhibitoryaction of the CFS was mainly due to the organic acids produced by LAB. Antimicrobial metabolitesproduced by LAB comprise lactic acid, acetic acid, hydrogen peroxide, and diacetyl. S. aureus was able toform a biofilm, which was successfully inhibited by the CFS of L. bulgaricus FTDC 8611.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98aba/98abadb1435b0cfbe63f2dabdddc22693678da81" alt=""